Tunasteak: Any explanation why they did this? It's so strange for me, i'd expect it to not be a very hard thing to do and mantain, right?
Vainamoinen: The GOGmixes with most votes were the negativity fostering ones, bullshit mixes like "games that treat customers like second class citizens" got a lot of likes, which kind of defeated the entire purpose of the system, i. e. to foster
positivity about games.
Even if we're really being whack with the benefit of the doubt, it's clear enough that people used GOGmixes less as a themed collection of recommendations (that was the very definition of "gogmix") and more as a system of destructive criticism, hyperbolic warnings, personal vendettas, centralized shorthand shit flinging, and choleric overreactions to market realities.
I liked the idea of GOGmixes a lot, I had my own mix (which ended up with six likes or so), but eventually, the system was abused the fuck out of to the point that the whole thing cost them sales instead of garnering them, so I guess nixing it was the only path left to go.
To GOG as a games sale platform, the usage reality of the feature sucked major balls. It's definitely not coming back.
I guess it was not fun for an indie developer to finally publish their game, after struggling with their limited resources, only to find it immediately classified as "No Polish - No buy!!!".
Then we had the downright offensive ones, like "Beamdog is the parasite of the industry", which was actually deleted (no doubt after a complaint from the developer).
I miss the good GOGmixes a lot. I also had one that I spent quite a lot of time in, and I really wish I could continue building it. But from a business point of a view, I can see why they were problematic. Maybe they could come back with a bit more of the moderator's engagement (wishful thinking, I know).