Well, you are the first person I have meet arguing that companies like Coka Cola and Exxon favour comunist ideals ( (or is even remotely left-wing) - refreshing. But yes, better to leave it there. Only want to say left-wing (and indeed socialsism) =/= comunism

No idea what you mean here. "invalid" in which sense? "Excuse" for what?
Except that that is wrong so no it wouldnt make any sense. My answer was not a personal answer but a general answer to the general quoted question. It was made for strong impact. Reach as many people who lost trust and convince them that they can trust CDPR again. And I think I properly explained why a name change makes sense. It costs them money just like any other action. There are various points to it (see former posts: Reach people - if you cant contact them you cant regain their trust, etc) so its not 'pointless'.
And if you want to properly argue about cost maybe give some actual numbers and not just 'some monies'. Not that it changes that it makes sense in the list but you could maybe argue that it would have a bad cost-effect ratio.

There were many companies there, some of them are in favour of socialism principles, while others, comunism principles.
That's why I said "most", not all of them.
I understand that socialism =/= communism, but both have shared principles here and there. Just like radical right-wing and radical left-wing. But even famous authors couldn't define for sure what is what, who are we to define what is what here without a deep debate?

It's an interesting research, aligned with how right-wing parties tend to use, sometimes, left-wing economic strategies, which is weird, because most of them consider themselvs "conservative".

But the topic is complex. Sorry to bother and thanks for the chat about it. :)

--edit

The bad about this 'downvote' mechanic, is that people who doesn't agree with you can down vote without expressing their world view, which means, we, who get down voted, stay without understand other people point of view.

Not that we should care about this in the first place, but, shouldn't we understand who disagree with us in a polite way? How can we analise each other point of view if just pressing a 'dislike' is the most used tool to, well, disagree?

Say your arguments. Im a person that loves debates. Even in PM if you want. I'd love to chat with who disagree, so we can all learn. :)

Which "investors" are you referring to?
The only big "investors" (shareholders(*)) that I am aware of are the founders/managers of the company themselves. If there are some other "investors" or similar outside forces having a bad influence - please share.

(*) You can see major shareholders here: https://www.cdprojekt.com/en/investors/shareholders/

Relating to the topic:

The recent CDP hacker claims that CDP will lose even more trust if their documents are leaked. This implies that we may not have seen the worst (of CDP) yet.

Sources:
Topic about the hack: https://www.gog.com/forum/general/iohi_so_cdpr_got_hacked
Hacker message: https://twitter.com/CDPROJEKTRED/status/1359048125403590660/photo/2


Edit: Somehow the link to the hacker message doesnt work properly. You may need to manually click on the 2nd image to see it.

More details on the above: https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/09/cd_projekt_red_hack/

At least they were transparent about it, but again... doing a bad job and being transparent and saying you're sorry is not the worst things, but definitely not the best either.

I uh... I appreciate your need to share all this, but is there really a point to posting it in three threads?

what do you mean three threads? it is the same copy-pasta wall of text in at least 5 different threads now. Spam by any other name

edit - ah, I see the modrators are finally earnig their keep. well done

Apologies, fixed now.