Posted Yesterday
Yes, there is that; but I am in no position to talk about it. I believe it allows you to run some Linux applications under Windows but I think it falls short of a "Linux experience". I could be wrong.
I have heard some bad things about it, and it could require some technical know-how to install and use.
Here is my opinion on this matter: the graphical UI and "user experience" lead to immediate reactions. Things like updates, packages available, releases, philosophies, that only surfaces after some time of using. You get to evolve your opinion, your likes and dislikes, your "I can live with it" and "this is a deal breaker for me, what are my options?".
As for the desktop environments, they work best when you employ the entire "suit" of applications that were made to work with it. It is not mandatory, but they integrate better. "Why isn't my dark theme respected? Why do the icons look different and different fonts are used? Why does application A send deleted files to the trash bin, but application B just deletes them?"
Kubuntu is an non-official spin-off that targets the same inexperienced user base as Ubuntu, but pre-selects the default user applications. It runs from a live CD, so it could not be an install option.
This is my understanding.
I am with you on Flatpacks!
I have heard some bad things about it, and it could require some technical know-how to install and use.
dnovraD: And yes, the desktop environment is important, but given you can install a new one without changing distros *(unlike what Ubuntu has tricked thousands of people into thinking)*, I'd place more priority on the packaging philosophy and ease of use of the distro as (initially) presented.
Hehe. Yes, the Ubuntu flavors left me confused at first. Here is my opinion on this matter: the graphical UI and "user experience" lead to immediate reactions. Things like updates, packages available, releases, philosophies, that only surfaces after some time of using. You get to evolve your opinion, your likes and dislikes, your "I can live with it" and "this is a deal breaker for me, what are my options?".
As for the desktop environments, they work best when you employ the entire "suit" of applications that were made to work with it. It is not mandatory, but they integrate better. "Why isn't my dark theme respected? Why do the icons look different and different fonts are used? Why does application A send deleted files to the trash bin, but application B just deletes them?"
Kubuntu is an non-official spin-off that targets the same inexperienced user base as Ubuntu, but pre-selects the default user applications. It runs from a live CD, so it could not be an install option.
This is my understanding.
I am with you on Flatpacks!