If there is a subscription for Galaxy that serves to pay the costs of it, how to proceed afterwards must be approached on GOG's part with fresh, unbiased eyes. Otherwise, it will just be more of the same favoritism and Galaxy at any expense, whether it makes sense or not.

I'm confident in the gamble even though I know if I'm wrong it would be an even worse store for people like me. I strongly believe the "client-loving modern gamers", who GOG (via pouring tons of resources into Galaxy) chases after with the zeal of Pepe le Pew, are not going to be able to hold up their end of the deal.

So to me, it is worth the gamble. Let's see how irrationally committed GOG is to Galaxy (i.e. if they were to persist with pushing it even if it were to be revealed to be a money loser) and how committed the modern gamers are to GOG (i.e. will they pay a fee to use Galaxy), by putting both parties to the test.

They are already doing that, while making the annoying ballast pay for Galaxy development and maintenance. I don’t think a Galaxy subscription could worsen that significantly.

I don't really see how that changes the current status quo.

Will galaxy need to be taken to see the rabbits? If so, I know quite a few here who would volunteer.

Unfortunately, that is true too.

Can we start a "Get bought by itch or zoom" wishlist item next? After shit like the tip jar and personally losing access to all my games for seven days(maybe permanently in due time) I feel it is in order.