Posted June 11, 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46f6a/46f6a966b22c20a447abe0daf38e8a440ff073be" alt="avatar"
Fact: They've replied to us, and the reply was a good one...but not one you like personally because they aren't up to your specifications for an "answer". So you feel justified in arguing here instead of through PM to gog/email to EA/etc.....or other reasonable, non attention getting channels.
The answer EngimaticT gave was vague, which is what I said. It doesn't provide key information. Do they have a good reason? Maybe. Given their track record? Probably. Doesn't change that it is vague, and vagueness is scary. And saying so in a quiet and private way doesn't bring the issue to the attention of other users, or to anyone trying to gauge community response as a whole. The forums are a great deal more effective as a medium for this. P.S. By advocating a boycott after years of wanting EA to come to gog over such petty things you are basically putting the proverbial foot in your own mouth. Gog has given an answer, and while you haven't outright said it in your mind you feel betrayed by gog and want to lash out......if only this were worth lashing out for.
Saying I feel "betrayed" is, at best, an assumption on your part. I'm not meaning any harm to GOG, or even to EA. GOG is a great site that I generally love to make purchases from, and EA's back catalog is worth the best treatment they can offer. I have no gripe for EA as a whole, but their current output on GOG warrants a consumer response. Should it be more level-headed than it has generally been? Sure. Should it be confined to one thread, rather than spread across three? Probably! Should it be an idea that needs to be shut down completely and kept as quiet as possible? I don't believe so.