Lone3wolf: Now you're just parroting baseless claims that are demonstrably false.
Provide citations that SHOW that steel must be destroyed to trigger a building collapse.
Not just "conspiracy sites" that have little factual value, only fabricated opinion.
slash11: Baseless ?
Where is the steel structure ?
What happened with it ?
EVEN if you would assume that fire can melt steel. What happened with the rest of the steel structure for WTC 1,2 without any fire....
The only way to manage such collapses of WTC 1,2,7 is using explosives = controlled demolition
No. Stop hand-waving and address the claims YOU raised. We're not going to do YOUR work for you. You make a claim the steel was "cut", "blown up", or otherwise "removed". YOU prove it was so. We'll then argue your math and physics, and mechanics to show YOU that YOU are wrong.
Noone with knowledge of the relevant disciplines has EVER said the fire destroyed the steel. The fire
contributed to its failure, but the most damage to it was the aircraft and building rubble (depending upon which building you're focusing on at the time).
So come on : Show us where YOU think the steel "disappeared" and was otherwise tampered with by an "inside job".
slash11: Is of course personal opinion......
And that's your problem, right there. Opinion. NO facts. Nothing behind it but your "wish" it is so.
Come back when you can defend properly your claims.