MoP: Was unaware of this and sure gave ma pause, but what I'm now reading is supposedly someone taking a quote out of context and misrepresenting it or something. Are You referring to
this interview?
Coelocanth: Not specifically that one, no, although I have read it as well. There were a couple others, but I don't recall exactly where I saw them now. But as I noted, I still use it. Really, there's not a whole lot better protection than common sense and being careful. Couple safe practices with the protection you do get from MSE (as well as MBAM) and I've had no issues for several years of using it.
Sure, just wanted to catch up, and was wondering if there were other statements I didn't find or something. I've had a good run with MSE myself, but if they'd down right advise not using it themselves, I'd have to reconsider I think.
Apparently PcPro was where the story originated, and for what it's worth Microsoft issued a
droning statement about their commitment in response, and
some folks also got to the source for clarification.
It could be just back-pedalling, but the wording in that original article does seem off, since some paraphrased, not directly quoted sentences make it seem like the Microsoft rep was advising actually using
another real-time "antivirus" on top of MSE, not instead, which is obviously off. So it might be just a case of overblown misinterpretation this time (or at least they cared enough to back-pedal ;).