No more Euro Truck Simulator 2 then :(

And you thought that this joke in the face tragedy was appropriate because... why exactly?


Condolences to everyone involved.

Because this thread was opened at a time when most sane individuals went from knee-jerk #notallmuslims reactions to "I'm getting sick of this shit".

(I meant to write “White and right‐wing” but I noticed too late.) Anyway, no one said they were, but I sure don’t see the same kind of reaction when such stuff comes from a left or minority environment.

Has the phrase ''be the change'' ever been communicated to you?
That's the problem though. Many people here think the question is why they don't get to choose by themselves what's OK. A simple hide posts of users feature perhaps?

The question of whether its OK or not really depends on what the people managing the forum wants, ie you guys. To some forum owners, what Bradley said is OK. After all, forum and site rules aren't enforceable laws and what rules are obeyed is virtually fully in the hands of the managers. Its not anyone said online forums must have parity with real world laws beyond not allowing illegal activity.

Victims? Eurotards brought all this on themselves, the only thing to be sad about is more people weren't killed.

Unfortunately, a state of absolute compliance with such laws can never be achieved on a forum, so its the choice of the forum owner whether an example may be an actionable one irl or not. That is, if illegality is the sole measure of removing posts.

An important difference though is that heavy handed laws that curb speech can be legally pursued in court in real life while on the internet, it will just be a gradual imposition of more and more regulations. Ofc any regulations can be had since its not the user's forum, but that's where the question how much control shows up.

I for one certainly don't want moderation like that on the default subs of reddit for example, or neogaf, where the actual rules are ignored and the real rules are little more than agreeing with a position or being banned. Basically, what I'm saying is that I don't think ''conventional'' moderation is not something to aspire to.

Wow, simply disrespect because we "Europeans" brought this to ourselves? Much appreciated, because you show exactly with no further need for any evidence what the main problem here is: Pure ignorance and hatred!

Yes, what you said is true, someone will be mad at whatever change happens. So I guess the only option is to select a method that makes a balanced compromise? But the question remains, if any type of moderation is to be implemented, what will it focus on?

Ie what will it target? Shouldn't it have a more well defined goal? Ie stop the alt account and report and rep abuse or this ''hostility'' problem. If curing the forum is the objective, what the primary diseases are should be found out beforehand, right? Doesn't make sense to fight an invisible enemy.

Muhammad is the perfect role model of Islam. Muhammad was uncertain that he would reach Heaven. Yet the Quran offers a few guarantees of reaching Heaven.

-Immigrating to another country, bringing the message of Allah and dying in the process. "And whosoever leaves his home as an emigrant unto Allah and His Messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then surely incumbent upon Allah."
-Jihad in the cause of Allah. "Let those (believers) who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of Allah, and whoso fights in the Cause of Allah, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward (Surah 4:74)".

Yet you people either wonder why these acts are being committed or call those of us bringing this to your attention hate mongers. THE TERRORISTS ARE THE TRUE BELIEVERS!

Here come the down votes.