It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
WinterSnowfall: the dark ages with their inquisitions and witch hunts... I'm surprised anyone stayed back here in those times.
avatar
Sachys: those came in the medieval. the dark ages were long before the inquisition.

also witch hunting was carried over with colonisation.
avatar
Linko64: aye but you can get a geet MASSIVE hammer, so that's a plus
avatar
Sachys: not if a man named Paddy wearing an eye patch wields it.
Attachments:
paddy.jpg (104 Kb)
avatar
Crevurre: They mean the New World as in the Americas. They wanted to then put fantasy into that. As you can immediately see, that doesn't make sense. Like putting world of warcraft style fantasy into colonial British India setting....and I don't mean Draenei
Have you ever played a pirate game? A fair amount of slavery on the high seas during the Age of Sail / Exploration; some pirates were believers in freedom, but not all. With that said, why would they ever use pirates in medieval fantasy games?

Have you ever played a vampire game? You know what vampire thralls are right? Wait, they use vampires in Skyrimn too. Hmmmm... problematic! How could anyone enjoy that?

Have you ever played a game in ancient Rome? Ancient Greece? Ancient China? Yep... same in all.

My point is simply this:

IMO your issue with the setting of New World -- and the way you expressed that issue -- says more about you than the game.

If you want to judge / disqualify games due to "bad things" that happened in tangentially-related real life history, you'll be disqualifying quite a tremendous, tremendous list.

But please refrain from making gross generalizations about vast numbers of people.
avatar
Crevurre: New World looks like gw2. These guys copied gw2 and that is bad.
avatar
timppu: I had to google for what New World is (some forthcoming Amazon.com MMO that will be running on Steam, apparently...
Amazon too poor and incompetent to have their own client? Yikes.
avatar
timppu: I had to google for what New World is (some forthcoming Amazon.com MMO that will be running on Steam, apparently...
avatar
Lucumo: Amazon too poor and incompetent to have their own client? Yikes.
Do they also have some kind of streaming gaming service like Stadia etc.?

They'd probably want to invest more on that... but I am unsure how suitable a (free-to-play?) MMO is to such a streaming service which costs the company a lot of money to keep up, so naturally it can't be a home for free-to-play games where people by default are not willing to pay monthly fees (after all, it wouldn't be free-to-play then, right?), and where microtransactions are not guaranteed to bring enough money in (which is why I think e.g. Valve has lost interest towards Team Fortress 2).
avatar
Sachys: those came in the medieval. the dark ages were long before the inquisition.
Well, I guess you're right considering the official historical conventions. But those were still "dark ages".

avatar
Sachys: also witch hunting was carried over with colonisation.
Can't deny that, but they usually had bigger problems in the new world, at least initially. As in let's not starve now, hunt witches later.

avatar
J Lo: You left out nanners.
I was gonna clean my room...
Post edited April 27, 2021 by WinterSnowfall
One thing that intrigues me about TNW is the fact that when you level up, you get points to spend on your attributes. This is different from most MMOs where you just get flat stat increases with level up, but most of your stats come from items.
avatar
Lucumo: Amazon too poor and incompetent to have their own client? Yikes.
avatar
timppu: Do they also have some kind of streaming gaming service like Stadia etc.?

They'd probably want to invest more on that... but I am unsure how suitable a (free-to-play?) MMO is to such a streaming service which costs the company a lot of money to keep up, so naturally it can't be a home for free-to-play games where people by default are not willing to pay monthly fees (after all, it wouldn't be free-to-play then, right?), and where microtransactions are not guaranteed to bring enough money in (which is why I think e.g. Valve has lost interest towards Team Fortress 2).
No clue, don't think so.

A client is/was pretty much standard for MMOs. Limiting yourself to Steam is a pretty stupid thing to do. I know some use both, so it's probably compatible too.