Hm.

What do you know about Caroline Bianchi ?

What you see in the post.

Another question for Darko :

Any difference between Night 2 and Night 3 ?

Jmich, despite still lurking almost as much as me, does pop in now & then with pretty much one liners debunking a point.
Highlighting flaws in reasoning can help, but this just comes across as argumentative for the sake of it.
This plus the complete denial regarding Telika's deductions make me suspicious.

Telika, I am concerned that you seem to be hunting all the powerful roles.
You were after Nmillar yesterday & you're after Darko today.
This, combined with your super power makes me worried.
I think Vitek suggested that not all your results may be completely kosher & I share this worry.

Red Baron, your list post screams at me.
2 lists in the same post?
Looks like an attempt to muddy the waters & add deniability.
"See I had him on this list" or "Look, I re-evaluated & took him off of my second list" or whatever.
The only person that appears on both lists is our claimed (so far useless) cop.
An attempt to sow suspicion & get rid of him before he becomes useful?

Assuming Amok was potential extra scum, we're probably looking at 2 surviving mafia.
I'd label them as Jmich & Red Baron.

Vote Jmich

In the flavor PMs? No, just variations of me jumping out the window, rushing off to the woods and forgetting my sorrows (and the occasional watching the moonlight sparkle on the snow because apparently Joe is a poet).

1) Darko (if town) is not a powerful power role. At all. He'd be when mafia could potentially waste a nightkill on him, not since the mafia knows to not target him. And the mafia doesn't need to lynch everyone of us.

2) I am basically clearing :

a) a possible cop (we'll see if i'm right about this when he'll target a "power")
b) a flavor thief (who may perform a direct "copping" if he stumbles upon a handkerchief).

So, y'know, just sayin'.

You need to make up your mind.

It's a very powerful role before it's outed.

It appears my reasoning for them does not make sense, hence I probably explained it badly:

List 1: If I take everything at face value and assume that Joe is only truthful and have been thorough with flavor, then Telika's flavor does not match mine in any way other than the name and possibly by my role having an age for an aunt or grandmother. I have zero mention of a nephew which I assume Joe would have included if my character brought along the inspector, even more so since crimes and fear is mentioned and nothing about any nephew. Add to that Telika does not appear to know a fairly important point about my role and as such I find it most unlikely that Telika is town, if I can trust the above mentioned about flavor connections.

In addition my should not be named are also rather specific and hence I arrive at the other CSPVG, but as he is a bugging role for me both purely in regards to flavor and in regards to my own personal opinion that is why he is on both, while Telika is not.

However I am still pretty darn certain I don't want to lynch the person most suggested by Telika (blame Joe for a massive slip-up in flavor connection if Telika is indeed town and my nephew or a really odd choice of making zero mention of family or reason to be there).

But still some of it hinges (you know what) on the names hence why I am not certain yet.

So yea. flavor list and my own personal list, it should make perfect sense to keep those separate in a joe game where one is never sure how much to trust. As for confusion.. really?? The only ones who even took notice was a brief comment by Vitek and then You rodzaju, so don't really get the big evil strategy in this.. At any rate I also agree that Telika does have a nack for powerroles, but his role just appear so powerful if scum, and if he is lying about his role, what is he then? A watcher withe the added bonus of being scum hence knowing the targets of those? Thats my own reason as to why he is not on my personal list. But can I trust my own judgment?

Edie Delaney

My opinion, DarkoD13's role flavor seems plausible. The comments from Rodzaju are interesting and I have stated previous in a different fashion. JMich seems to appear from the lurk coffin to comment on something (pertaining to him) and then......<poof>

RedBaron, you have hinted many times at your role being somewhat disabled, but no, my text makes absolutely no mention of that so I cannot confirm it. If I intended to lie, I would have included all I can 'guess' about you, but on the contrary, this is a point I cannot confirm (and which would be interesting to).

Anyway, have I to understand also that you backtrack on claiming that you had to persuade a Lawrence Birsch to come, or that you had never claimed so ?

2 people commented on it in this apathetic game and you think it is not enough? That's like avalanche! :-)


Who you want to claim next?

I am terribly sorry for taking so long but it's better than nothing.

It occured some time ago to me, that OP and our PM say that "You may not mention your LIKES, HATES nor CLUES after Day One". I forgot about it back then and let it go. But I finally asked Joe yesterday if it means that we are only disallowed to talk about our clue but we can talk about clues of others.
He replied to me that I can't talk about clues of others because I don't know them. So I asked thim if we can talk about those thing people posted and claim to be their clues and he told me there is no reason why we couldn't.



I want show something from D1, but I first would like to finish the name claim.

Then, unless I'm mistaken, the names that were not claimed are Rod's, JMich's, P1na's and yours.

It would be nice if people who claimed soemwhere far in the past said their name here too, if only for clarity.

I am Peter Browning and I am 31 years old.