Posted January 17, 2014
This is absolutely silly and may not work, but I've been wanting to give it a shot. So, I'm going to Unvote Red_Baron and Vote Caroline Bianchi.
This is very odd, I know, but I've been wondering if one could vote for our NPC story-teller since amok's claim. Although, I'm not merely doing because I can, and there is some logic involved, but you're going to have to bear with me. The idea behind wanting to see if this will work, is that Caroline Bianchi seems to be relating this game as if its outcome had already been experienced by her. Thus she survived whatever horror befell our friendly ski instructor, and by extension some of us. I thought if I could lynch her before she had gotten to the end of her story, none of it would have happened, thus meaning that the mafia never killed anyone, and we could all just go home.
As I've said, this is quite silly, but it's worth a shot. If my vote isn't accepted, or if Joe hasn't appeared to tell me as much by Sunday, I'll change it.
In light of this, would the moderator be so kind as to give us a vote count.
Moving on, I think it' perfectly possible for amok to discuss clues tomorrow, however obliquely. Unless I've missed something in the flavour post or rules, the only penalty for speaking about our clues after day one is public ridicule. Whether this just means the GOGfather showing up to say that, from now on, everyone is to call CSPVG Alex Undergarment, or whether Joe was being euphemistic, I'm not sure.
Speaking of clues, however, I think that we've pretty much run out of time to cover them on day 1. Monday is the deadline( if I remember correctly), and I just don't think that it's going to be possible to reach mass agreement on whether sharing our clues is good or not, and then have time to properly discuss them and their ramifications.
I'd still like an answer from all of you on whether or not you find Red_Baron's actions scummy.
This is very odd, I know, but I've been wondering if one could vote for our NPC story-teller since amok's claim. Although, I'm not merely doing because I can, and there is some logic involved, but you're going to have to bear with me. The idea behind wanting to see if this will work, is that Caroline Bianchi seems to be relating this game as if its outcome had already been experienced by her. Thus she survived whatever horror befell our friendly ski instructor, and by extension some of us. I thought if I could lynch her before she had gotten to the end of her story, none of it would have happened, thus meaning that the mafia never killed anyone, and we could all just go home.
As I've said, this is quite silly, but it's worth a shot. If my vote isn't accepted, or if Joe hasn't appeared to tell me as much by Sunday, I'll change it.
In light of this, would the moderator be so kind as to give us a vote count.
Moving on, I think it' perfectly possible for amok to discuss clues tomorrow, however obliquely. Unless I've missed something in the flavour post or rules, the only penalty for speaking about our clues after day one is public ridicule. Whether this just means the GOGfather showing up to say that, from now on, everyone is to call CSPVG Alex Undergarment, or whether Joe was being euphemistic, I'm not sure.
Speaking of clues, however, I think that we've pretty much run out of time to cover them on day 1. Monday is the deadline( if I remember correctly), and I just don't think that it's going to be possible to reach mass agreement on whether sharing our clues is good or not, and then have time to properly discuss them and their ramifications.
I'd still like an answer from all of you on whether or not you find Red_Baron's actions scummy.