imdwalrus: Why?
If you think the game is worth $10, then you can still pay that much, to either GOG, straight to the developer, or to charity.
If you don't think it's worth that much, then you probably didn't preorder in the first place.
Where is the room to be mad? I'm not seeing it.
It's an optical illusion. As if a guy got married to the love of his life, the next day met a girl he figured was even nicer and lamented at how awful his wife suddenly was. It makes no sense unless you believe in such bs as opportunity cost and you think value is relative as hell.
When I saw the Botanicula preorder, I figured "$8.99 ? That too much, no fricken way". Some thought "OMG ! I'm saving A DOLLA' !" and bought it. Now they think "OMFG - I LOST $8.98 !" while I think "$9.99 ? That's a lot. $0.01 ? That's not really a lot".
Why some people will claim to have actually (almost "physically")
LOST money is beyond me. I mean - I understand the thought process but it doesn't really make sense to me. Before I buy something, I think A LOT. After I deem it worthy of my money - I spend it and
never look back. It might as well be free the next day - I DON'T GIVE A DAMN (Fallout 1 giveaway, anyone ?). I've made the right decision
back then, nothing
right now is going to change that.
I've been searching for the right link for a few hours now but just take my word for it: there is a fallacy out there that goes like this:
A gambler can bet on the outcome of a fair 6-sided die roll. He can either bet $10 on the result being 1-5 or $10 on the result being 6. The die is rolled and 6 comes up. The gambler concludes: "I should have bet on 6, now I know that was the correct choice".
IT WASN'T. Assuming that the probability of rolling 6 was 1 in 6, the choice to bet on the result being between 1 and 5 was and forever will be the rational one, no matter any dice rolls made before or after.