ZPavelZ: I am afraid your URL is broken. Thanks for the contest.

rooshandark8: Umm, I am not sure how i can fix it,
Just copy and paste,
And to make sure this contest is good i will be timing it.
*Ends* in 15 hours from now

serpantino: Steam is an application and digital media distribution service made by Valve. Steam power is much akin to the girl power the Spice Girls pioneered as it has swept it's chosen medium like wildfire and nowadays many games require steam.Some people love it, some people hate it with a passion.
Turbine is best known for creating Asheron's Call and Lord of the Rings Online and are part of Warner Brothers. They're currently no on steam sadly.

JudasIscariot: The UN doesn't really help any countries in crisis. They simply write very passionate letters to the leader of said country in crisis and sternly ask him/her to stop hurting people. Or they station themselves in a very poor African country and do what they like there because there's almost law in the land. Please see some the Vice travel videos about Africa to see what I mean.

ZPavelZ: If the UN should help other countries in crisis,
Now, I am afraid there is a slight misunderstanding here.
I have studied at a school, which was very much pro-UN, and even had a chance to meet the UN Secretary General (Mr. Boutros-Boutros Ghali) and even was allowed to ask him a question. Now, obviously we had been taught about what UN is/was at that time (1990s) what it does and does not.
One of the most common critique one heard at that time towards UN was the following - it is nothing more than a council, which writes papers, makes resolutions, about which no one cares and so on. In other words, already in the 1990s UN was regarded as a mere council of representatives with very little real power. That does not necessarily mean UN is powerless, but that points out its flaws.
The organization itself is perfect for promoting certain things, raising awareness about certain issues, influencing public opinion and so on and so forth. But in the end it will always be up to the governments of the member countries to make the real actions. And they in turn will only do something, if they find it "useful" or even "profitable".
Now, what UN "could" do (and certainly "does") is write memorandums, pacts, resolutions, agreeements, try to stimulate governments to act in certain ways and so on. But that stimulation alone would not be enough. Thus I would not put this question the way it is posed by the OP, I would rephrase it this way.
Should UN (the organization) stimulate its members to help countries in distress?
The answer for me is "yes... and no".
The "yes" part comes from the obvious common trends the world is facing today. Economics, social life and politics of the countries become more and more interdependent (look at EU and Russia, for instance, or EU and USA). The latest financial crysis has shown how one country's problems can influence everyone else. Wall Street problems spread across the world as plague. And it is no-one's fault really - it is just the way things are. Cross-country investments, mutual economic dependencies in the production-purchase cycle and other things like that casue everyone to feel the pain of others. And hey it is a good thing - this means less actual military conflicts as those affect EVERYONE (the looser AND the winner alike). Also if somewhere situation becomes too drastic the floods of refugees cover other countries - take Italy, France and Africa for instance. Italians are overwhelmed by the illegal immigrants and France feels that pain too - when they travel illgeally within EU across borders. Thus we are indeed in the need for global stability.
The "No" part is much more tricky. Different countries are in different situations. They have different traditions. Small example - Northern Europe has very small corruption rates, while Southern Europe (some countries) have them very high. So what happens, if you just give the money to, say, Greece? That is right - their politicians steal everyting and common people continue to suffer. So, IF the help is delivered, it really has to take into account just exactly HOW it should be made - not just mindlessly throwing the money at other countries. Instead of making the situation worse rather than better for everyone.
By th way, here UN could play a really good role as place for mutual consultancy and working out the policies of HOW the help should be delivered. But so far, unfortunately, I do not see that happening - represntatives just follow the simple "good old" "throw in money, send the troops" ways of "helping". And that is not really helping.
Phew, I am out of breath, but I tried to give a profound answer to the question.

rooshandark8: Good job mate,

Your answer is quite detailed But,
You get 1 for answering it
2 point for effort
+6 for details
Total Points 8

You may Anwser the question as many times as you want, But it has to be different each time
You can even make a drawing *aka uniqueness points*

ZPavelZ: Sure. Anyway I do not think there is a "right" answer to that question. That was merely an opinion (the one that I have been working on for many years, though).

rooshandark8: Looks like i given you the chance to use your answer,
Now enough seriousness,
Go do that steam one
Make it fun to read,
include steampunk in it.

ZPavelZ: Did not really get it. Is that a poem of some sort? Sorry, if I misunderstood what is going on here.

rooshandark8: Lol, 1 point for effort
1 point for uniqueness
1 point for doing it

Total Points: 3

*Thats not that good of points mate* Its about Steam energy steam turbines, Heck even steam punk
You should elabroate on the stuff more and make it lol worthy,

Atleast a few paragraphs And
Keep it Not that gaming related you may however add a few jokes about valve's steam in comparasion to real steam.