dedoporno: Here's the thing. I saw something earlier that made an impression on me and back then I wasn't sure if and how to react to it, but wanted to make sure I hint about it at least in passing so if something unexpected happens from the other side things don't automatically go south. Fortunately, additional actions weren't necessary and the game went into entirely new direction which currently seems just a bit better.
Anyway, unlike myself, Yog exposed a lot of information voluntarily and by himself, and considering what he claimed you have to agree questioning had to be done. If you don't, then I will frown upon you.
1. What? I don't follow that. At risk of speaking for everyone, I'm not sure who caught what you were referring to - we're confused now but it will make sense later?
2. I'm pretty ambivalent on what one gains that's positive by questioning yogs now vs the downside risk, so maybe throw me a half-frown? I just thought the contrast was notable. that said, at this point I think i've moved you into the townside of things, but that was at least partially with the impression I was at least vaguely following the shape of what you were doing.
At this point I'm not sure anything in the game makes a whole lot of sense to me, other than that the people with the two crazy claims are probably at least being mostly truthful.
flubbucket: The More You Know......................................./psa
I thiiiink I actually included the youtube for that in one of my posts. Memory a bit fuzzy.
Lifthrasil: Finally a question to all: what do you think? Should we go for one of the two claimed killing roles to reduce the number of night-kills? Especially since at least one of them might be lying? Or do we go for the player that
plays scummiest and buy the claims for now, until the slew of power roles hat a shot at them at night?
I didn't read it as him claiming vig.
That said, I also thought it at least possible he was just making his own joke recalling the bulletproof berserker claim. Or maybe RW assigned this persona on purpose as a joke, who knows.
bler144: So logically, in this scenario you're proposing HSL is scum and I'm town, else yogs wouldn't be disappointed.
Bookwyrm627: You missed some tricks.
I get the sense I'm missing lots of things. Anything in particular I should be more cognizant of?
HypersomniacLive: Decided to check in as I have some break time. And see a couple of things I can't say hat I like. Stumbling upon something that pissed me off quite a bit, doesn't help either.
I have to go back to working shortly, so I'll get the thing that pissed me off out of the way, and put my reply-notes to bler144's posts to use.
bler144: two incidents maaaay not be predictive in any case.
HypersomniacLive: And besides lazy, you are also being pretty dickish, and ever so subtly manipulative at spinning that whole series of exchanges into something it clearly isn’t (look HijacK, more aggressiveness from me).
I don't feel like I'm getting heat for being asynchronous, and if you followed the exchanges as they developed you can clearly see it.
Woah woah woah. Mea culpa.
I really truly did not mean it that way and am sorry - I 90% thought I was mostly making fun of myself (see the "maaaaay not be predictive" line I thought was making clear I was just chatting/bullshitting), and 10% making a footnote just so that if you do flip scum at some point I can quasi-brag that I knew it all along even though I have no meaningful read on you at all.
Likewise, I was trying to seriously say, albeit in a joking fashion that I thought was self-directed, that I appreciate you repeating key game details b/c for whatever reason I'm missing them when RW posts them.
As for the asynchronous exchanges, I clearly missed the point. But I was at least trying to scatter humor in a number of my posts last night, and wasn't intending it at all the way it clearly came across to you.
Will stop here, take a break and pick up in a separate post later.