It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Vitek: I talked about the approach I also mentioned in the last game. Instead of saying this is discussion between A scum and B town, one says, this is Town x Mafia conflict. A is more scummy so let's lynch him and if he flips let's go with B next.
It's great way to setup chain mislynches.
How is it possible to see some argument as scummy from one side but not be sure which side it is?
I mentioned it last game in regards to Lift, who said this about me and SPF. That he sees SPF as scummy and me as town but he sees it as T-M argument so if SPF flips town he needs to focus on me and he did so. Textbook chain lynch. Here you even threw yourself in for good measure as third option.
So much this. If we actually talk it out we are more likely to find scum as they will fall through the cracks the longer they have to participate.


avatar
dedoporno: Is there anyone who has openly expressed interest in voting flub?? I'd like to meet them.
I think everyone wants to lynch flub just because he's flub LOL. A few people have said they are only 90% sure flub is town, but I don't think ZFR would put a player in the game and confirm them as town but they are really scum. I don't think we have a character like JMich in the game as a Town Bodyguard, if we do I think my head might explode.
Super-Post Deploy:

avatar
mchack: SirPrimalform : Can't really put my finger on it but the way he attacked flub didn't sit well with me. Also
avatar
SirPrimalform: By suggesting to the possible vig that they not make a kill on the first night, it rather seems like you're setting up a situation so you can not kill N1 and then on D2 go "Welp, looks like we've got a vig!".
avatar
mchack: non-sequitur! how can she say looks like we got a vig on D2 just because she didn't SK on N1?
Huh?

Poppy's suggestion was that the possible vig not kill anyone on the first night as a signal that there's a vig.

Therefore if we have a SK who decides not to kill on the first night, the conclusion Poppy would have drawn is that there's a vig. I was suggesting that if Poppy WAS a SK she may have made the suggestion as a set up to make the town think there's a vig.

What non-sequitur?

avatar
mchack: anyway, general bad vibe from SPf
Well it's not my first instrument...

avatar
Bookwyrm627: SPF looks to be pretty thoroughly in Poppy's pocket, his claim about being willing to vote her not-withstanding.
I find that interesting. As far as I'm aware I've defended Poppy on one point only and I was criticism of the argument, not defence of the person.

avatar
SirPrimalform: To which I replied (in the very next post):

To which your reply was (as far as I'm aware) complete silence. So no, you did not address my request.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Silence might have been TOO succinct an answer. Granted, I may be answering for him, but the main thrust of his argument is that you stopped defending her, thus creating distance. There are no posts to point to, which was precisely the point.
A very good defence of flub. Of course, you're aware that now you've made this argument you aren't allowed to stop mentioning it because that would be distancing.

You see how silly that is? The fact that I didn't keep going on about something doesn't mean my position on it has changed, it was just a lack of any more to say on the matter.

So do we all need to make sure to reiterate our views in every single post or can we assume that when someone doesn't say something, it means their position hasn't changed?

avatar
flubbucket: I agree with this assessment.

...

This is also an accurate assessment.
Please see above comments. :P

avatar
Lifthrasil: Which is why I took that post as some kind of semi-joke. That's the beauty about flubb being confirmed town. He can write his usual mix of jokes and actual questions, he be as flubby as he likes without being a distraction. Which raises the question: why do you waste so much time on analyzing flubb? No matter how much you analyze, you won't be able to convince anyone that he's scum because he is confirmed by the mod. So how about focusing on players who actually can be scum?
But it is a distraction. It's a complete waste if our innocent child spends the entire game throwing around accusations that he refuses to back up. I'm not trying to convince anyone he's scum, I'm trying to get him to actually be helpful.

You are right that I'm letting this distract me too much though. I think Vitek's our better lynch (key being the weird vig instruction from Poppy), but I would support the scene-wagon.

Vote VippyAppletek

It's about 24 hours to the "day could end at any time" phase. I'll be on at some point this evening but that's probably it in terms of actual reading. Hopefully I'll be able to check the thread at lunch tomorrow but probably only to see what the game state is and change vote if necessary. I'll be busy all afternoon and since the deadline is 2pm there's a possibility I won't be around for EoD.
avatar
mchack: Vitek, you yourself said we should try and lynch those of us that give us the most information with their flip. (and the lurkers should be copped/vigged)
avatar
Vitek: Have I really? If I did then it was only to push some of my agenda (the part about copping/vigging I said for sure). In fact I believe people should be lynched for being scummy, not for providing most info. Sure, if I feel equally about two possible lynches I pick the one with higher informational value, but no, I am not supporter of lynching someone because it provides informations.

I talked about the approach I also mentioned in the last game. Instead of saying this is discussion between A scum and B town, one says, this is Town x Mafia conflict. A is more scummy so let's lynch him and if he flips let's go with B next.
It's great way to setup chain mislynches.
How is it possible to see some argument as scummy from one side but not be sure which side it is?
I mentioned it last game in regards to Lift, who said this about me and SPF. That he sees SPF as scummy and me as town but he sees it as T-M argument so if SPF flips town he needs to focus on me and he did so. Textbook chain lynch. Here you even threw yourself in for good measure as third option.
ok. I got cold feet and did a quick skim of your posts last game back when I was still alive in that game, because I was pretty sure you said something like that last game, but all I found was this:

https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_54_pokemon_death_tournament/post453"] To lynch her would be wasting our lynch, though, and it is exactly what I would call low-hanging fruit.
It gives us no information whatsoever and we'd be basically doing mods work at expense of 1 Day.
Sure, she may flip mafia, but it wil be mostly just random chance of hit. [/url]

So I guess I have to retract my statement, you never said we should try and lynch those that give us the most information, but only said we shouldn't lynch people that won't give us any information (like absent players/lurkers).
Sorry about that. I wasn't intending to misrepresent, I just seem to have faulty memory.

As for your chain mislynching argument. It's a good one and I have to think about it. I still find lift comes out looking scummy from his interaction with poppy, but any kind of chain (mis)lynching should be avoided. Still, don't you find it enervating to not follow up on the agitator if the wrong (ie town) partner of an argument got lynched? Like with zfr/lift last game. It's much more likely that when two big wagons end of Day 1 have one with scum on it, that the other one get's lynched, because no reason for scum to bus on D1. So I think we should think real hard about lynching the other lead wagon on D2... hmm, not if it's Tvs.T of course ... I'll need to read up on a few games to know if it's common for Scum to have the second highest wagon on them D2 or if it's just happened this once (twice if you count #53)

----

avatar
mchack: -I don't like how lift nudges people to vote: bookwyrm in #165 and vitek in #201 (feels like he wants a lynch, not caring much for who)
avatar
Lifthrasil: Yes, I DO want a lynch. No-lynch is bad. Especially on D1. Unless you are scum. And I want people to put down their votes so that others can see them. No waffling about 'Yeah, anyone might be scum, but I'm not going to commit to anything'. ... But other that you assume I do care about who we lynch. I would prefer Scene or Vitek. Vitek didn't exactly do much to dispell the scummy impression that Poppy left. SPF, Joe and you are in the 'better them than no-one' territory. But I'm not going to vote trent or dedo or HSL today. I'm getting quite towny vibes from them. And I'm definitely not voting flubbucket, obviously, no matter how much some players would like to make him look scummy. I trust that we are not in a bastard setup.
scene or vitek likely scum eh.
SPF, Joe and myself in the better than no-one pile.
trent, dedo, hsl and of course flub are townread

That leaves: gogtrial, bookwyrm, dessimu ... Into which Pile do you sort them?


avatar
mchack: And should you flip town, too then let me go on record that I should be lynched next. For coming up with this stupid argument. But I don't really think both of you town. Argh, now I'm not sure anymore. It would really suck if both of you were town. damnit. it was easier making arguments last game, when I knew other people's alignment. :P
avatar
Lifthrasil: This reads very much like a LAMIST statement!
Yes, it is. Because it _IS_ much harder making arguments when you can't be sure of anything. You should try it some time, maybe you don't remember anymore :P
avatar
mchack: SirPrimalform : Can't really put my finger on it but the way he attacked flub didn't sit well with me. Also
avatar
SirPrimalform: By suggesting to the possible vig that they not make a kill on the first night, it rather seems like you're setting up a situation so you can not kill N1 and then on D2 go "Welp, looks like we've got a vig!".
avatar
mchack: non-sequitur! how can she say looks like we got a vig on D2 just because she didn't SK on N1?
avatar
SirPrimalform: Huh?

Poppy's suggestion was that the possible vig not kill anyone on the first night as a signal that there's a vig.

Therefore if we have a SK who decides not to kill on the first night, the conclusion Poppy would have drawn is that there's a vig. I was suggesting that if Poppy WAS a SK she may have made the suggestion as a set up to make the town think there's a vig.

What non-sequitur?
not true. As I understood Poppy she said if we have two kills N1 then (should the possible vig listen to her) we can assume we have a SK. that's it.
She has not said anything about what to assume if we only have 1 kill. Nor did she say we should assume we have a Vig if we only have 1 nk. You said that. But it's non sequitur because from only having one NK we can't follow that we have a vig, we don't learn any hard info from that.
avatar
mchack: SirPrimalform : Can't really put my finger on it but the way he attacked flub didn't sit well with me. Also

non-sequitur! how can she say looks like we got a vig on D2 just because she didn't SK on N1?
avatar
mchack:
avatar
SirPrimalform: Huh?

Poppy's suggestion was that the possible vig not kill anyone on the first night as a signal that there's a vig.

Therefore if we have a SK who decides not to kill on the first night, the conclusion Poppy would have drawn is that there's a vig. I was suggesting that if Poppy WAS a SK she may have made the suggestion as a set up to make the town think there's a vig.

What non-sequitur?
avatar
mchack: not true. As I understood Poppy she said if we have two kills N1 then (should the possible vig listen to her) we can assume we have a SK. that's it.
She has not said anything about what to assume if we only have 1 kill. Nor did she say we should assume we have a Vig if we only have 1 nk. You said that. But it's non sequitur because from only having one NK we can't follow that we have a vig, we don't learn any hard info from that.
No, I never said anyone could draw hard conclusions. But by setting up the assumption that two NKs means a SK, it naturally follows that one can point to a single night kill as being indicative of there being a vig.

Quoted again here for reference:

avatar
PoppyAppletree: If we do have a Vigilante, then please, please don't shoot anyone on Night 1. As has been noted, 50% of C9++ setups feature a Serial Killer. As such, if two people die on Night 1, we're a going to think we have a Serial Killer on our hands. As such, a Vigilante should refrain from a Night 1 kill.
This plan weights the conclusions people might draw from a second NK (or lack thereof), possibly in order to manipulate opinion tomorrow.
It also strikes me as somewhat redundant, as I think N1 would be a bit of a reckless point for a vig to start shooting people (but maybe that's just me).
All in all, the whole thing gives me bad marimbas.
avatar
mchack: That leaves: gogtrial, bookwyrm, dessimu ... Into which Pile do you sort them?
Into the 'not decided yet' pile. Dessimu is quite absent, but he has a good RL reason for that. His first two posts looked a bit weird, but that's it. Bookwyrm was quite lurky too but is present now and I want to read a bit more from him before I put him in some pile. gogtrial seems neutral and I see no reason to lynch him. So, after going over what he wrote so far again, I'd put him in the 'don't lynch' pile.

avatar
mchack: not true. As I understood Poppy she said if we have two kills N1 then (should the possible vig listen to her) we can assume we have a SK. that's it.
With which she warned a potential SK not to kill anybody in N1. However, I don't think that that was her intention. I also don't really read it as a preparation for a Vig claim but rather as an attempt to look useful (again), by stating something obvious.

But since you like defending Poppy, perhaps you could explain what makes her so towny in your eyes.
- was it the way she flip-flopped between 'I have a solid read' and 'oh, it's only a gut feeling after all'?
- the fact that she would have liked to lynch the only confirmed towny for personal reasons?
- the OMGUS vote where even she herself felt the need to point out that it wasn't meant as OMGUS?
- the 'I don't want do distract and I know that what I write here is a distraction. But I still write it' post?

To me, all of that looks either like bad play or like scummy play. I still read her as scummy and I'm still saying we should either lynch her slot (Vitek) or Scene. Since lynching one will possibly tell us something about the other and I see a good chance that these two are a team. ... And maybe you're the third one? Was that why you tried to shift the attention away from both of them?

Perhaps your just a towny on the wrong track. But your LAMIST post still looks scummy. Even though you defend it by repeating to claim that you are town. But town should never knowingly propose a mislynch and IF you are town you do exactly that with
"And should you flip town, too then let me go on record that I should be lynched next."
I think if you actually were town, you wouldn't feel the need to offer yourself as the next mis-lynch in the case of the proposed lynch being a mis-lynch. You would know that that would be bad for town. No, this statement really reeks of "Look at me! I am even willing to sacrifice myself! See how towny I am?!" In other words, it is a very scummy statement. All in all I hereby promote you from the 'better than nobody' slot to the third place in my personal 'probably scum' list.
avatar
Vitek: So Dessimu, Lift, scen or Lift prehaps?

Tell me why I'm wrong.
I see it! you put lift twice... Am I right? :p


avatar
Vitek: ...
avatar
Lifthrasil: I see you've started catching up and contributing. So tell me, why is your vote still on HSL? I get that it was initially a joke vote. But now that you do have some tentative reads and HSL isn't one of them, why don't you switch your vote to someone else? Someone you think could be scum?
Why so eager? There's 24 hours till deadline still!

Argh!


avatar
gogtrial34987: Is this your first time as scum?
No, actually, I was also scum in game #16, game #18 - hay WAYTAMMINIT!


avatar
gogtrial34987: Do you think Dessimu will have a deja vu feeling for your reads list as well?
I prefer lists that include everybody - it helps avoid creating DOLs, and prevents lurkers from being out-of-mind. I also like the idea that on mafia flips we can look back at how they constructed their lists and try and make something from that. Some people feel like having to read a bunch of irrelevant and useless waffle is 'boring' and 'not a game', but I say those people have no resilience!

avatar
gogtrial34987: Oh, hey, I followed this exchange: <BLAHBLAHBLAH> and if that's the pointed out contradiction which you're thinking of, then it wasn't actually there, as it was based on a misreading. (And I misread it the same way, but am now wondering if I did so myself, or only noted it in HSL's quote together with his interpretation.)
yes yes yes it could be that, somebody else mentioned recently something, maybe the same thing, maybe not. Hopefully I've got it in one of my tabs.


avatar
HypersomniacLive: You want to lynch me over something I said, something you don't understand, and want me to explain to you... seems totally legit.
well when you put it like THAT of course it seems unreasonable!


avatar
HypersomniacLive: Seriously though, I don't quite see what's so puzzling about it, nor why it's getting into your head. I asked SirPrimalform if he considers terrible play making less than 10 posts per day* that (additionally) don't (necessarily) go over everything posted by others.
Where does the example come from? I think I read it as a description of your own play - is that right? What's the answer you want from Spaff?
But I guess I was interested in it because I thought you were talking in terms of town-tells, and if you aren't it loses some of its intrigue.


avatar
JoeSapphire: have no interest in voting flub or a Vitek.
Which Vite-

avatar
trentonlf: [...] I have no interest in voting flub or a Vitek.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: How about two Viteks?
aww...


avatar
HypersomniacLive: Funny you should mention drealmer7. With gogtrial34987's vague memory as a starting point, I checked the start of your games from game #42 onwards, and the only game you did that was cristigale's (#46), and guess what... drealmer7 was town, and you were scum-buddies with trentonlf. One game's still no pattern, but you didn't do it as town either.
OHO! That's an interesting discovery!



avatar
gogtrial34987: Oh, hey, I followed this exchange:
back to its origin:
and if that's the pointed out contradiction which you're thinking of, then it wasn't actually there, as it was based on a misreading. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I think it more likely it was your post #148, and the way you contrasted supplementscene's two posts.
Thanks!

... hm I read that one and it wasn't as illuminating as I'd hoped. I'm feeling a bit stuck.

...

Mass claim anyone?


avatar
mchack: oh well it's D1 and we gotta lynch someone. My money is on Lift. (figuratively speaking. I'm not betting since it's not allowed (Should be good odds though if I were. like 30:0.5))
Is that money on Lift being scum, or money on Lift to get lynched?


avatar
Lifthrasil: This reads very much like a LAMIST statement!
avatar
mchack: Yes, it is. Because it _IS_ much harder making arguments when you can't be sure of anything. You should try it some time, maybe you don't remember anymore :P
my goodness isn't that a compelling thought...
avatar
gogtrial34987: Is this your first time as scum?
avatar
JoeSapphire: No, actually, I was also scum in game #16, game #18 - hay WAYTAMMINIT!
Sounds like you’re admitting to being scum this game.
avatar
JoeSapphire: No, actually, I was also scum in game #16, game #18 - hay WAYTAMMINIT!
avatar
trentonlf: Sounds like you’re admitting to being scum this game.
yeah that's right! Me and gogtrial are on a team togeth- hay WAYTAMMINIT!!!
avatar
JoeSapphire: Why so eager? There's 24 hours till deadline still!
Because I hate cramming all voting in the last few hours. That's a very bad habit around here which gives scum far too much freedom in voting without giving good reasons for their votes. 'I'd rather vote anyone than risk no-lynch' is a far too easy argument to make. Especially since town does the same under time pressure - and is making bad lynch decisions in the process. So, waiting until shortly before deadline before voting is very, very bad for town!

So, why shouldn't I be eager? Would you prefer that we wait until the deadline and go to the usual panic-voting with a side order of risk of no-lynch?


avatar
JoeSapphire: Mass claim anyone?
No.
Mods is it worth checking with Dessimu if he's still playing??

avatar
supplementscene: These seem like strange points to focus on. You interpreted my initial post wrongly. It was a general comment. Joe obviously wasn't making a thorough investigation at this stage.
avatar
gogtrial34987: I'm glad we agree on that. ;P

So then what I'm left with is the initial puzzlement about the why of the statement. If the thorough investigation wasn't related to Joe's behaviour or your impression of it, then why did you mention it? Are you writing nice sounding but effectively meaningless platitudes in order to "seem busy"? Or were you thinking in four directions at once, and skipped a few steps in writing down your thought process? My "let's interpret things positively" impression of you at this point is that you like making sweeping statements, and are frequently trying to convey the "feeling" of a matter. As I try to be very precise with my words, there's a strong disconnect there, and I find it hard to get into your mindspace. (To be very clear, I have you as my strongest scum lean by far (not that strong in absolute terms, but very strong for D1), so I don't intend to move my vote anytime soon. All the same I'm always questioning myself and wondering if I'm tunneling, so am also trying to interpret your behaviour as town before it's too late.)

avatar
supplementscene: I initially found Poppy's attempt at analysis and to provoke discussion useful. She was helpful in her replies to me early on. You're right the standard of analysis probably isn't 'high quality' as such, maybe those were the wrong words.
avatar
gogtrial34987: So, just to confirm, there aren't specific points in any of those posts which you could now point to as giving rise to that impression? (I do understand we're many days hence by now - would've been good if you could've answered this when I first asked it.)

avatar
supplementscene: Perhaps that's why we're the only 2 on the wagons. Whichever way you look at it we know more now and will know more after the lynch. And I would ask 'why did this player throw the heat on Scene and Poppy'?
avatar
gogtrial34987: That's indeed always a very good angle for looking at things. If you look only at players "throwing heat" at the both of you, who all stands out for that to you? Any thrown heat in particular which strikes you as inconsistent?
I think there potentially could be 4 Scum players on my Wagon yourself included. If there is higher number of Scum they could take a high risk strategy and create wagons with their numbers. If you think about it everyone had a different reason for voting for me. Just look at the way the wagon grew at haste.

And that includes you ofcourse. While you maybe Town, why keep asking the bandwagon man the same questions as if you expect some huge insight on 1 or 2 throwaway comments amongst the reems and reems of posting I've made??? This looks sort of Scummy. Maybe you genuinely think you've seen something but why I know not. Is it because?

Joe voted me on the first page randomly, yet he's still on my wagon now. Why? Although if anything maybe he's the none Scum player as targeting a busier player.

Trent's reasoning was way off. First he votes Poppy and then I make an analysis of Poppy where I noted Poppy's suspicious behaviour. Then Trent and Lift claim I look Scummy for not explaining my Poppy vote. Yet this is my prior analysis on post 107 before my vote on 120:

Poppy - has had the most heat for allegedly distracting Town by focusing on Mafia numbers. Hinted at 'seeing something' with HSL and then seemingly backed away from it. Flub and I thought she hinted at the Bulletproof role. Others think it was a throwaway comment. Now she's posted that Town shouldn't over analyse because it isn't possible real time and isn't fun. She thinks Lift is playing his Scummy game. But is that townee play? I'm not sure


Are Trent and Lift Scummy voting because I didn't explain when that explanation is there? You jump on the train for (and correct me if I'm wrong) for this reason and because of saying Poppy had good analysis? Also Trent's analysis isn't at all deep but I didn't think it was in the last game where he was town.

SPF also asked about my posting style. In a prior game Lift when Scum explained 'this is his posting style'. He hasn't in this game, when if you view it, it absolutely is. Can you answer this @LIFT Is that because he's got a townee comfortably on a wagon?

I think it's time to update my VOTE LIFT. I was initially torn between Poppy and Lift. I still am, it could even have been distancing because if we find out one is Scum, we'll asume the other is not.

avatar
supplementscene: [...] Well why don't you know? You read the last game enough to pick out 2 instances of my play so you should be able to make your own judgement. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I am in the process of making my own judgement, hence my interactions with you. I just find some things odd, and wondered if there isn't something else, an outside the game factor, that I should be taking into account, hence my question. Apparently there isn't, or you prefer we don't take it into account if there is. Either way, I'm discounting it, and moving on. I'm sorry my post came across as condescending to you when all I wanted was to be fair to you.

avatar
supplementscene: [...] I thought it was clear, I'm unsure whether Lifthrasil/PoppyAppletree confrontation is TT or FT. I'm only sure it's not FF as I don't think that would make sense. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Yeah well, it wasn't clear to me because I misread "learning" as "leaning"; sorry.

avatar
supplementscene: [...] Trent I'm not too sure on at the moment. I thought his initial analysis seemed logical. But now I'm wondering if Poppy and Trent could be Scumbuddies. Create distance by voting for her only to switch on a townee before the deadline.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: So you initially town-read trentonlf, but because he switched his vote to you, you now consider he and P̶o̶p̶p̶y̶A̶p̶p̶l̶e̶t̶r̶e̶e̶ Vitek may be scum-buddies, yes?

Assume that both you and trentonlf are town, how is he supposed to be sure that he's currently voting a townie?
You have to theorise who may or may not be Scum. If Trent is also town he can't be sure I'm Town. Maybe I've thrown too much

avatar
supplementscene: This doesn't seem entirely logical. If Poppy was Scum wouldn't it be a LAMIST thing to say? You knock my analysis because it's 'convinence' when I have already given an analysis of her play and pointed out aspects that are either Scummy or unfortunate.
avatar
trentonlf: If Poppy ends up being scum then it was a good vote, but the way you voted was a vote of convienence. “VOTE POPPY - I know I'm Town 100%. I don't know if she is so it's a better to vote on that wagon and she seems as best first day lynch as anyone.”

Your reason for voting her was because you don’t know if she’s town, and you preface that with a “I know I’m Town 100%”. If you’re town you shouldn’t know anyone who’s town except for flub and using that as your reason for voting is just a vote of convienence.

avatar
JoeSapphire: Question for all: Who is your top three preferred lynches? Go!
avatar
trentonlf: I don’t do lists, not a big fan of them. My preferred lynch is Supplementscene, and I have no interest in voting flub or a Vitek.
Wait when did I say I know whether anyone was town or not? I didn't, I've said the opposite throughout. As noted in my post above I'd already analysed Poppy's more suspicious comments in my reads on post 107. Did you even read this post? Or did you ignore it and try to twist my words in a Scummy way???
HypersomniacLive has played quite a cryptic game. He analyses a few things others miss. Ask questions without making any accusations. It would be a good playing style for a Scum player because he doesn't upset anyone. Doesn't get into any back and forths. He just stands back looking busy but not really commiting to any lynch party. He hasn't said anything Scummy at all but it would be a good style to not attract attention if in fact he is Scum.
avatar
supplementscene: I think there potentially could be 4 Scum players on my Wagon yourself included. If there is higher number of Scum they could take a high risk strategy and create wagons with their numbers. If you think about it everyone had a different reason for voting for me. Just look at the way the wagon grew at haste.
4 scum players who are on your wagon in a coordinated fashion in a game which has a maximal scum faction size of 3... yea, right. I'll re-iterate a suggestion that you have gotten before: read the setup!

avatar
supplementscene: Are Trent and Lift Scummy voting because I didn't explain when that explanation is there? You jump on the train for (and correct me if I'm wrong) for this reason and because of saying Poppy had good analysis? Also Trent's analysis isn't at all deep but I didn't think it was in the last game where he was town.

SPF also asked about my posting style. In a prior game Lift when Scum explained 'this is his posting style'. He hasn't in this game, when if you view it, it absolutely is. Can you answer this @LIFT Is that because he's got a townee comfortably on a wagon?
Yes. I can answer that. I actually already did: I'm cutting you less slack than in the last game because you had time to learn. You even made a point of improving your game at the end of the last game. So I'm not treating you as an absolute newbie anymore and I expect better explanations from you. Also in the last game I was trying to pull you to my side by being intentionally understanding and helpful. I wanted to make you trust me and I wanted to make you mis-vote. Which succeeded. Was that mean? Yes. But as scum one has to pull all tricks to survive and buddying up to a townie who is under suspicion from others is one of the standard tricks. This time I don't know whether you're scum or town, but I wonder whether you coming to Poppy's help was support for a scum-buddy or whether you adopted the very trick I used against you in the last game. I.e. buddying up to a towny, (if Poppytek is a towny after all).

Also your reason for voting Poppy boiled down to 'I'm not sure'. That's not enough as a reason on it's own. Yes, as town one can never be sure. But you should at least have some reason to assume that your target has a higher chance of being scum than the others. Otherwise the entire game boils down to random voting. Not fun. And you weren't attacked for the reason you just quoted and bolded, but for the reason you gave with your actual vote and which you now conveniently omitted.
avatar
supplementscene: VOTE POPPY - I know I'm Town 100%. I don't know if she is so it's a better to vote on that wagon and she seems as best first day lynch as anyone.
Here you basically say (re-phrased, to make it clearer why it looks strange): 'I don't know her alignment so I might as well vote her, since there is already a wagon.' ... This reads very arbitrary, is applicable to any player (so nothing specific to her) and suggests that you vote for any wagon as long as it isn't on you.

If that was poor wording on your part which led to a misunderstanding, please clear it up. Let's turn the usual 'who is your preferred target' question around: are there any players which you definitely wouldn't lynch today? And if yes, then who and why?
I've only skimmed the thread to check the vote count and update my own, and would like to say the following before I catch up from where I was last on:

The Vitek wagon is stuck with Dessimu's vote on it, who may well not come back in time to reaffirm or change his vote, nor share anything that will allow us to read him for that vote. As things are, it effectively makes Vitek lynchable with one vote less than anyone and everyone else. If Vitek's town, scum can, and likely will take advantage of the situation.

With that in mind, his wagon went from 2 to 4 votes rather fast which makes me squint a bit at those last two votes on him.

Thoughts?


Off to catch up.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I've only skimmed the thread to check the vote count and update my own, and would like to say the following before I catch up from where I was last on:

The Vitek wagon is stuck with Dessimu's vote on it, who may well not come back in time to reaffirm or change his vote, nor share anything that will allow us to read him for that vote. As things are, it effectively makes Vitek lynchable with one vote less than anyone and everyone else. If Vitek's town, scum can, and likely will take advantage of the situation.

With that in mind, his wagon went from 2 to 4 votes rather fast which makes me squint a bit at those last two votes on him.

Thoughts?

Off to catch up.
Vitek’s wagon is the perfect place for scum to hide if Vitek is town. Poppy was under a lot of suspicion and that makes Vitek a viable lynch for several people to try and clear things up, scum voting him can just blame Poppy’s behavior to lynch Vitek. I don’t think Poppy/Vitek is scum, when Poppy was in the game she gave me Town vibes after the pressure she was under with the responses she gave and since Vitek has subbed in nothing has changed my view of them being Town.

I also noticed when bookwyrm voted Vitek he left himself an out to remove the vote, made me wonder if it was in case the wagon didn’t gain any traction he could say “after reconsidering things I don’t think Vitek is a good lynch today so let me move my vote to xxxxx”