myconv: Also anything but capitalism has barely been tested.
morolf: It was extensively tested in the Soviet Union and its satellites, and the results weren't positive.
Soviet union was a corrupt mess after Stalin. Even if a few brief alternatives were tried, most anything would be doomed to fail under that hot mess. Also do you expect all new advancements in technology to succeed after one attempt, even in the best of conditions?
Vietnam now is a better example of a nation trying to look past capitalism, but they can't escape it entirely. Capital based markets are world wide, literally.
morolf: Or are you a full-blown commie?"
The false dichotomy fallicy. It's so tiresome and so disingenuous and gets uses soooo very much!
It goes like this, you have to have "capitalism" or "socialism/communism" These are your only options(aside from the super negatives like fascism etc), we know because psychic powers tell us so or why do we have to justify our baseless claims! You justify your claims we call baseless!
Now attach BS definitions that make capitalism sound great by default (and call all the issues with it little flaws because nothings perfect) and define socialism/communism as just anything government run. Or Russia or China, even though they are nothing like either. Basically define socialism & communism as taking away peoples freedom, because you say so. And since you've "established" it as the only alternative to "capitalism" because you say so, you win! We shouldn't take peoples freedom away!
Argument complete, rinse and repeat if your opponent tries to go into any details. Just blow off their complex arguments with some quippy sound bite you developed from the base false dichotomy position and you win! Congratz on defeating the idea of true freedom to win a argument
Final pro-tip, make sure to completely ignore inconvenient facts like succssful noncapitalist systems (US post office for example) have existed even in pro-capitalist places like the US and that there are many such examples.