It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
MaridAudran: Dungeon Lords: Dreamcatcher: Fantasy PC game supposedly helmed by D.W. Bradley of Wizardry fame. He must have gotten a pre-frontal lobotomy before developing this clunker, however, since it's an egregiously bland, buggy, and half-finished product. A 3D hack-n-slash cRPG with graphics straight outta 1997 ala Descent to Undermountain, despite being a 2005 release. Add unforgivably clumsy combat, illogical re-spawning (like literally when you turn your back for a couple of seconds), no music (NONE), quests you don't care about, and a generally arid and pedestrian RPG world with few people inhabiting it. This one didn't last long on my machine.

Heretic Kingdoms: Inquisitor: A thoroughly mediocre isometric action/RPG ala Diablo. Feels decidedly low-frill and low-budget (no CGI sequences, no voice-acting; exposition is revealed through dialogue boxes), which wouldn't have been out of the ordinary in 1995, except again, it's released in 2005. The gameplay gimmick of Heretic Kingdoms is this "Dreamworld" you plane-shift back and forth to from the "Real World." However, that's just an excuse to fight ghosts and apparitions in the former vs. bandits and wild animals in the later, and to mask the rather skimpy enemy bestiary. Combat is simple but made burdensome by awkward control schemes. Theoretically you can customize the character towards a fighter, thief, or mage character, but in reality the bias is heavily towards fighter; the other two build options are quite impractical in combat (Lionheart: Legacy of the Crusader suffered from a similar problem in the later half, but at least that was a much better written and designed game in the first half). An oddly self-deprecating and sarcastic sense of humor also permeates the game, like the writers from Bard's Tale were on loan, which really trivializes any sort of epic adventuring vibe the game was going for. As far as your action/RPG knock-offs go, Nox or Divine Divinity is leagues beyond this dross anyway.

Metalheads: Replicant Rampage: Very poorly translated Russian cRPG. Weak Fallout clone with some slapdash cyberpunk elements thrown in. Boring, plodding, and aggressively linear. Stiff American voiceactors reading abysmally translated Russian is especially painful to listen to.

Ultima IX: Dragon Edition: The extra money I spent as a teenager for the deluxe boxed version was icing on the turd cake of momentous disappointment as a gamer, and betrayal as an Ultima fan.

Singles: Flirt Up Your Life!: It's embarrassing to admit I even have this in my game library, but there you go. I never played The Sims during the initial craze but decided to see what all the life-sim fuss was all about with this German-developed knock-off that was ported to America. Basically it's the exact same sort of game with simulated (and heavily blurred) sex scenes if you pursue the "romance" subplot to conclusion that's written into the code. The "writing" in that subplot makes an episode of Friends read like Jane Austen.

Incidentally, I bought these during the last hurrah of Brick-and-Mortar stores before most of them shuttered their windows or were bought out. Since then in the Digital Distribution age (basically the only PC game in town) I've been a much more discriminating gamer and make very few impulse buys, so the number of outright clunkers is much less.
Haha. I've been hoping for Heretic Kingdoms on here for a while now.

:P
avatar
AFnord: I did, and I never actually finished that dungeon. But at least the game was not broken at a fundamental level, unlike say Dungeon Lords, and some enjoyment could be had from the encounters. They just got far too tedious & repetitive far too fast for the game to be worth a playthrough.
Fair enough, I was only including playable games in my list, if we're including broken ones probably whoever bought any version of Battlecruiser 3000 AD gets the internet instead:)
avatar
mondo84: Yoda Stories
The Sims Medieval is the worst game I own. After that comes Dungeon Siege 3, Next is Sacred.

Medieval=Too many rabbit holes instead of actual adventuring, Dungeon Siege 3 = unplayable after a certain point , Sacred = buggy and unplayable after a certain point.
avatar
orcishgamer: Fair enough, I was only including playable games in my list, if we're including broken ones probably whoever bought any version of Battlecruiser 3000 AD gets the internet instead:)
That would be... me...

Granted, I got it in a box containing 6 games. It also contained Mageslayer (an alright top down action game), Maximum Force (a really poorly made rail shooter), AMOK (a game that did not work), some rally game and I don't remember what the last game was.
Men of War. I thought I'm gonna love the game, but I hate it so much.
I have read this whole thread and made this made me think if I had the fortune or misfortune of avoidng abysmal games. None of the games I have truly suck because I have a thing for stories and voice acting but I have a couple lackluster video games that I just stopped after a short time.

W40k Dawn of War Soulstorm- Its Dark Crusade without any memorable characters and a bullshit hole filled plot thats there so the Dark Eldar and Sisters can be added and thats it. Its stale after one campaign and the Sisters, Imperial Guard and the Space Marines are fighting each other for no reason other then to just see who the toughest is. In Dark Crusade the SM had a justifed reason to fight the IG. There was nothing keeping me through playing this game after I beat one campagin.

Fable 2- This game does not suck but is not memorable or makes me want to play it again, Fable 1 was amazing that I bought the Xbox version when it came out then bought the lost chapters on PC later on. And im not going to talk about Fable 3. Fable 2 was enjoyable at the first half of the game but as the plot was slipping and the anticlimatic final boss I felt like I acomplished nothing. That or it lacked the charm of Fable 1.

Blacksite Area 51- This game is the only one I never bothered to finish as it lacked any intresting features of the first game Area 51. Avoid this game.
kasumi ninja

I never played a fighting game this bad.

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM82PgC1VVU

This make the game look good
avatar
stormyllama: Because it's TF2
Just because everybody and there goat like likes jumping off cliffs...

vive la différence

BTW I can't stand the Counter Strike series as well.
avatar
jefequeso: No, seriously. I want to know what your problems are with the game. I'm curious.
It's not so much the game, but the fan boys and the weird Apple like cult that the game has, I don't dislike TF2 because it's made by Valve.
Post edited September 04, 2012 by stormyllama
avatar
Fenixp: Men of War. I thought I'm gonna love the game, but I hate it so much.
The first one? I loved it!

I loved Soldiers: Heroes of WWII, I loved Faces of War and I loved Men of War.

Perfect tactical combat during WWII.

After Men of War, when I see tanks with healthbars in any other game, I just laugh.
Hey guys It'd be neato if you added youtube video links to your selections.
avatar
Fenixp: Men of War. I thought I'm gonna love the game, but I hate it so much.
Why? It's pretty strategic and more challenging than the easy Company of Heroes.
Post edited September 01, 2012 by excalibunny
avatar
keeveek: After Men of War, when I see tanks with healthbars in any other game, I just laugh.
Yeah, it's had cool aspect and things I really liked about it, which makes me hate it even more: I know I'd have enjoyed it, but only if I didn't have to repeat every bloody mission 5 times before finally completing it.
avatar
excalibunny: Why? It's pretty strategic and more challenging than the easy Company of Heroes.
In company of heroes, when I leave a bunch of soldiers standing somewhere, they will adapt to new situations, they will take cover accordingly, when I build a defense, I feel safe, knowing that those men will take care of themselves. In MoW, I felt like I'm commanding an army of complete and utter idiots that need babysitting at all times and that will happily jump to their deaths should opportunity arise. Basically: It's not strategic, it's tactical, except it's tactical with strategic elements thrown in. The very need to control every single one of dozens of men on a map was maddening - I like both strategy and I like tactics, but mixed together? Nah, thank you.
Post edited September 01, 2012 by Fenixp
Sonic Generations. Dead serious. I hated that game, far too hyped, and I can't believe anybody can like it. OK OK, the beginning was pretty nice, good tribute to the olden days of Sonic. In the most ironic way possible, it got worse as it progressed, as if SEGA wanted to reinstate how bad the games after the second "era" were. I even enjoyed the Modern Sonic levels more than the Classic ones, the latter was like the Werehog, both of them crummier game modes that you had to play in order to complete the game.
Crisis City Classic frustrated me more than any video game I've ever played. That flying end-of-stage sign wasn't even the half of my frustrations with the stage.
In company of heroes, when you leave your troops in front of enemy MG-42 fire, they will survive for couple of minutes even on empty area.

In Men of War, your entire squad will be wiped out in 4 seconds after.

In company of heroes, you may engage a tank frontally with your troops, one of them will throw anti tank grenade and you will probably survive with 1-2 casaulties.

In MoW when you make a move like that, your entire squad will be wiped out in 4 second from both tanks machineguns.

Tanks in MoW have their field of view, which means they don't see much from sides and behind, which makes flanking possible even on short distances. Impossible in CoH, where every unit has perfectly round and cirle field of view.

This is the reason I laugh at CoH and I love MoW.

But I have to admit, the AI isn't the strongest part in MoW. You may choose your troops to "move freely" (which includes finding a cover) but it usually made more trouble than manually covering them by mysefl.
Post edited September 01, 2012 by keeveek
Apparently a lot of you have never owned a bad game. The irony is some of your picks are laughably bad and hyperbolic. Burnout Paradise and Doom 3? Sure they have there problems but I can't imagine anyone considering them actually BAD.

I've owned these pieces of garbage at one time or another:

Backyard Wrestling: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3RHot_r_1c&feature=player_detailpage#t=15s

Superman 64: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7PlY_7TSJA&feature=player_detailpage#t=122s

Last Action Hero: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9nYSKhD4t8&feature=player_detailpage#t=13s
I already complained about it just recently, but again: Empire Earth. :P
Another really crappy game would be... hm... maybe The Longest Journey.