Posted July 08, 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20d69/20d695786ae8697f73aaa34167c0bea642cae0ca" alt="avatar"
I actually like not "owning" the games on steam, because it means there's less junk I need to contend with both on my computer and in my room. I've got a ton of game-boxes just lying around; I'm probably not going to play them anymore, but not a lot of people necessarily want to buy them. On top of that, I need to regularly wipe my computer clean of all the games I'm not playing and which are taking up valuable hard-drive space.
If, on the other hand, there's all this digital memory of games I own on a server somewhere, I don't have the hassle of trying to make space for everything. It's all on the server, taking up minimal space on my PC and no space in my home. I think the sheer convenience of the system is worth the possible risks.
As a person who archives his downloads from GOG, I wouldn't worry too much if GOG decided to cancel my account. That;s the beauty of GOG, you can choose to store your games that you buy from them and they do not require you to have a data mining client installed on your computer or anything else, except for DOSBox which is needed to run the older games here, except for the game itself.
Therefore GOG > Steam.